Have you heard about John Holt before? I mentioned him in last week’s blog about theWoodstock era and the value of free play, because it was his philosophy about how children learn and interact with the world around them that gave way to so many of the vibrant and celebrated parenting/education movements that many of you practice today, such as homeschooling, unschooling, and other unconventional, off-the-grid institutions like the one I went to as a young child.
I feel very fortunate to live here in Northern California where there’s such a vast offering of schooling options available to young families, each with beautiful and diverse communities surrounding them, from Waldorf schools, to small charter schools, to public schools that offer great independent study programs, and--up until last year--the ‘Nonesuch School’--a private, not for profit high school that focused on student-led curriculums and youth empowerment. That last phrase, “youth empowerment”, or “youth advocacy”, is very much one of the gifts of John Holt’s legacy. While it might not seem like a deeply radical or groundbreaking sentiment in 2019, for an elementary school teacher in the 1950’s--a decade when “children should be seen and not heard” was still touted unironically--to talk about young children as if they ought to have their own set of rights, opinions, and autonomywas very controversial! And no, John Holt (nor I) was/am suggesting that five-year-olds ought to have full control over their daily schedule and eating habits...It’s about looking into their eyes and seeing that there is a person in there, growing and learning and figuring themselves out, and seeking your validation and respect as they do!
Failing to successfully create spaces and moments for that individual to flourish, explore, and try was the fundamental flaw that Holt saw with the traditional school system, and what he and others sought to fix by championing the unpopular notion that children are learning all the time and that “school should be viewed as a convivial learning resource, like a library, rather than a compulsory treatment program.” The publication of Holt’s first book,How Children Fail, happened right around the same time as the “free school” movement was gaining traction. Citing the civil rights movement as a major motivating force, young people across the country began to demand discussions around education reform, on their university campuses, community colleges, and even in K-12 classrooms. Whether or not one agrees with their specific ideology or beliefs, I think it's important to remember that without the "radical" activists in the 1960's and 70's, we wouldn't have the more well-rounded education system and plethora of schooling alternatives that we have today!
Before I delve into talking more about John Holt's work, I wanted to make sure to acknowledge that the reason I and others know his name is because he was able to publish several books, make TV and radio appearances, and garner people's respect and attention, probably due in large part to the fact that he was an upper middle class, formally educated white man. That doesn't mean his work and writing isn't valuable or worthy of discussion, it just means that his ideas certainly didn't originate in a vacuum--they were influenced, inspired by, and developed in tandem with a larger social movement that included women, people of color, young people, and a whole other host of diverse and unique voices! At its core, the "free school" movement, was about“reclaiming lost power, lost cultural knowledge that has been buried underneath a disabling consumer culture where agency has been deactivated for the majority of the American public"--very radical ideas that were not necessarily well-received in their time!
One of John Holt's fundamental arguments was that "schooling" and "education" are not one in the same, which means that a child does not need to go to "school" in order to learn and have a wonderful education. After calling for school reform in the 1960's, by the 70's Holt had moved on to the idea that the traditional school apparatus was not the most conducive environment for children to learn in at all, and he started publishing the newsletter, "Growing Without Schooling", targeted specifically at families who were educating their children at home or in their communities. By the 80's, Holt publishedTeach Your Own: A Hopeful Path for Education, officially confirming his belief that the school system was just too broken too fix, and had to be abandoned completely in order to redefine society's attitude towards learning, education, and childhood. It's important to note that Holt's critique of school was a critique of the system, not the well-intentioned people operating within it! As a former elementary school teacher himself, Holt argued that trying to foster organic learning within the rigid confines of conventional schooling was challenging and damaging for the instructors as well as the students.
I hope that this topic resonated with you! As always, I'd love to hear from YOU about your experiences with child-led learning and free play. Let's build trust in learning together!